I pick up a copy of the Wall Street Journal.
Obama is set to release a plan to help small businesses . . .
That’s all that I needed.
Government intervention. To help something that should be compeltely laissez-faire, hands off, au naturale?
You ask, “Why is Walmart hurting small businesses? Why does the government allow such cruelty? They should enact laws to stop the trechory from happening?”
Actually, what you should be asking is, “Why doesn’t the government back off and stop giving incentives to big businesses rather than to the small businesses? Or wait, how about no incentives at all?”
You’re clearly demanding the wrong thing. We don’t need more government intervention to get rid of the problem that is already government intervention! Don’t you see! It would be like government vs. government.
I don’t see anything wrong with the free market running its course. I don’t think that if one business fails and another succeeds that there is a problem. I don’t believe in bailouts. If a business succeeds, so be it. There’s no reason to drag ’em down so smaller businesses “have a chance.” The market work on the basis of what people need — not what the government needs.